![]() |
Preparing the entryCanberra was one of the first designs produced after the Griffins’ marriage. It was a busy time, and producing the plans was a long, involved process. They almost failed to meet the deadline. The Griffins’ partnershipMarion Lucy Mahony worked in Frank Lloyd Wright’s architectural studio in suburban Chicago from 1895. Walter Burley Griffin joined it in 1901. By this time, Chicago had emerged as the centre of a new architectural movement. Its innovation was partly in the presentational techniques and, in this regard, Marion Mahony played a leading role (Vernon, 2002). After five years with Wright, Walter Burley Griffin left to establish his own practice. Then in 1909, Hermann von Holst took over Wright’s practice and opened a new office in Steinway Hall, where many of Chicago’s progressive architects were based. Walter also had an office in the building. Walter and Marion began to collaborate again and she joined Walter’s practice the next year. Marion thought that Walter’s work was languishing, ‘lying hidden away known only to immediate clients’. So she and Walter ‘put their heads together’ and devised an alternative ‘method of presentation’ (cited in Vernon, 2002). Their personal relationship also developed. Communing with nature on canoe trips in the Chicago area, they developed a strong mutual commitment to conservation and to each other. They married on 29 June 1911. Late newsAlthough the competition to design the capital of Australia had been announced in April 1911, word did not reach Chicago until July when the Griffins were still on their honeymoon. The opportunity to design a completely new city for a new democratic nation was too good to be true and the competition materials were sought. A call to actionThe Griffins’ office was busy with regular work and the competition work had still not begun by Novemeber 1911. With growing frustration, Marion admonished Walter:
With this catalyst, the work began. Devising the planFrom that point on, Walter and Marion worked feverishly on the project. As well as their city office, they took over a large room in Walter’s parents’ home as a second studio. As they developed details of the design, drawings were positioned on the studio walls to simulate the actual site conditions. However, no draft diagrams or records of their ‘collaborative dialogue’ survive; the Griffins’ submission is known ‘almost exclusively from the final drawings’ (Vernon, 2002). Marion at workMarion was responsible for the production of the final drawings. Architect Roy Lippincott, a member of the drafting team assisting, recalled her precise, inventive technique (Vernon, 2002):
The final drawings were completed in the Griffins’ Steinway Hall office in the last weeks of 1911. The resulting portfolio of drawings represented ‘an entire city set in a continuous, wider landscape’ (Vernon, 2002). A dramatic climaxSoon came the dramatic dispatch of the drawings, remembered later by Marion: ‘toward midnight of a bitterly cold winter night, the box of drawings, too long to go in a taxi, was rushed with doors open and men without their coats to the last train that could meet the last boat for Australia’ (cited in Vernon, 2002). |
|
||
|
| Home | Town Planning | A Nation Needs a Capital | A Capital Competition | The Griffins Win Help | Comments | Site Credits | Site Map | About |